[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: the problem of spam
- To: luci-discuss@luci.org
- Subject: Re: the problem of spam
- From: Danny Sauer <sauer@cloudmaster.com>
- Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 08:18:37 -0600
- In-Reply-To: <20040229172422.GB18300@osiris.silug.org>
- Organization: Linux Users of Central Illinois
- References: <20040227033122.GA15418@osiris.silug.org> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0402270831050.6087-100000@demeter.museum.state.il.us> <20040229172422.GB18300@osiris.silug.org>
- Reply-To: luci-discuss@luci.org
- Sender: luci-discuss-owner@luci.org
- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4
Steven Pritchard wrote:
[...]
> If you are reworking things anyway though, I think there are some
> clear advantages to the Postfix/amavisd-new/clamd combination when
> taken as a whole. For example:
>
> * Maildir (scales up nicely for big mail folders and plays nicely
> with IMAP)
> * Ability to block/allow mail based on regular expressions
> * Holds up well under high load
> * amavisd-new will fall back to running clamscan if clamd becomes
> unavailable
>
> (I'm sure there's more, but that's all that's coming to mind at the
> moment.)
You forgot "readable config file + sane config file handling", "proper
unix-like modular architecture" and the most obvious "Danny uses it, so
it must be great"... :)
--Danny, who'd like to convert Steve over to SuSE, but will settle for
just postfix ;)
-
To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@luci.org with
"unsubscribe luci-discuss" in the body.