Re: Linux Journal

[Leon Jackson <ljackson@davesworld.net>]

At 11:16 PM 5/2/00 -0500, Kara wrote:
>
>> 
>
>The training has, but not the testing. Keep in mind, granted RHCE is 66%
>hands on, it's not psychometrically developed. This means there is no R&D
>behind the RHCE that makes it legally valid to state that a passing score
>RHCE actually proves anything.
>
>Also, LPI exams aren't simple Q&A multipe choice answers. It's not
>distribution sensitive. It learns how you answer your questions, and
>expects certain answers down the road. You can't just guess. There are
>multiple answer questions, and fill in the blank. LPI isn't your standard
>paper exam.
>
Sounds interesting, What would you say is the skill level required before
attempting to tackle it?
Or should a person reasonably proficient with linux/computing computing in
general be able to do well after going through the course material?
In looking at most of the MS and some Novell exams you can pretty much pass
quite a few of them with no knowledge whatsoever.

leon

--
To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@luci.org with
"unsubscribe luci-discuss" in the body.