Re: override write protection?

[Charles Menzes <charles@lunarmedia.net>]

> 
> You realize, of course, that securing shell access to the box is
> almost futile.  But, this is better.
> 

	this is probably the most common thing i hear, and yet
	i am constantly on boxen that are allowed as public access
	by providers to allow for traceroutes from within their 
	networks. why would they do this without a certain level of
	comfort in the machine's security? are all shells as insecure
	as bash?

-
To unsubscribe, send email to majordomo@luci.org with
"unsubscribe luci-discuss" in the body.